CONSTITUENCY BRIEFING · ENERGYMAP.APP
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Hammersmith and Chiswick has no significant clean power approved and waiting to be built, and none running. Britain's grid bottlenecks still add to bills here: about £92 a year per household, £4.8m across the constituency's 52,139 homes.
Ranks 569 of 650 for clean power approved and not built.
What is stuck, and why
| Project and developer | Tech | Size | Why it is stuck |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westfield London Shopping Centre, Ariel Way - Solar PanelsUnibail-Rodamco-Westfield | Solar | 1 MW400 homes | Waiting 3.1 years for a planning decisionWho can move it: Hammersmith and Fulham Council · planning ref 2023/01724/PDJ56 |
Compared with its neighbours
| Constituency | Approved, not built | Running | Paid to switch off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hammersmith and Chiswick | 0 MW | 0 MW | not visible |
| Chelsea and Fulham | 0.8 MW | 0 MW | not visible |
| Richmond Park | 0.4 MW | 0 MW | not visible |
| Brentford and Isleworth | 1 MW | 0 MW | not visible |
| Ealing Southall | 0.2 MW | 0 MW | not visible |
| Ealing Central and Acton | 0.4 MW | 0 MW | not visible |
Brentford and Isleworth next door has 1 MW waiting, more than Hammersmith and Chiswick's 0 MW.
The rest of the briefing
- Every approval each project still needs, and which of them the public can see
- What building them would mean here — community payments, business rates and construction work
- Drafted parliamentary questions and letters, filled in with this seat's figures
- 2 story angles for local reporting
- A two-page PDF, and a newsroom edition with the references and who to call
Everything above needs no account, and neither does the full seat page, the method or this constituency's raw data. The account covers the packaged briefing and its PDF, and nothing else.